| Issue Number | 5035 |
|---|---|
| Summary | [EHR] Add elements to store diagnostic codes in summary documents |
| Created | 2021-09-23 15:48:54 |
| Issue Type | Improvement |
| Submitted By | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
| Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Status | Closed |
| Resolved | 2023-01-05 10:27:52 |
| Resolution | Fixed |
| Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.299384 |
Adding a placeholder issue for now, but I think we should consider storing information about which summaries are sent to MedlinePlus Connect (with flexibility to add other EHRs in the future) and the diagnostic codes. We'll likely want to develop some reports to display this information too.
The estimate is for the schema change, not for the reports, which will be tracked in separate tickets.
I am attaching the requirements for the schema changes here. ~juther may want to review and approve it before moving forward with the changes.
Adding EHR Codes to CDR_Proposed Summary Schema Changes.docx
In today's review meeting, ~juther approved these changes.
Installed on CDR DEV. I made two modifications.
The original called for a mixed content element for
{}CodeSystem{}. The mixed content model is appropriate for
running text which needs to have markup applied to some of the text (for
example, identification of special types of words or phrases, such as
scientific names or foreign words), but inappropriate for structurally
organized data. So I added the CodeSystemName as a child
node of CodeSystem instead of leaving it as an unnamed text
node child of {}CodeSystem{}. The alternate solution would
be to put the name of the code system in an attribute (though that would
make picking a value awkward, since one of the values has an embedded
space, and DTDs can't treat such values as valid value
choices).
I made the Comment field optional (in addition to
the requested "unbounded"), in light of the language in the requirements
which make reference to the fact that a comment might not be
present.
The requirements say "If the Comment element is used, pre-populate
the Attribute Inspector with the username and date." However, the
decision about whether those attributes should be populated is under the
control of the user, and depends on whether the Comment
element is inserted using the custom macro created for that purpose. If
that information isn't part of the replacement Help system used
by CIAT, it should be added.
Verified on DEV. Thanks!
The link above is incorrect and should be
Verified on QA.
Verified on PROD. Thanks!
| File Name | Posted | User |
|---|---|---|
| Adding EHR Codes to CDR_Proposed Summary Schema Changes.docx | 2022-10-20 10:56:28 | Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C] |
Elapsed: 0:00:00.002267