CDR Tickets

Issue Number 3215
Summary Transfer Protocols without Transfer Date
Created 2010-09-01 14:56:56
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Assigned To Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2010-09-20 17:33:38
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107543
Description

BZISSUE::4903
BZDATETIME::2010-09-01 14:56:56
BZCREATOR::Volker Englisch
BZASSIGNEE::Volker Englisch
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku

Kim has requested a report to be run weekly identifying any protocol documents that have not been reported as transferred InScopeProtocol records.

We will submit the output of the query that is currently stored as an ad-hoc report under 'Transfer Protocols without Transfer Date'.

Comment entered 2010-09-03 18:17:22 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-09-03 18:17:22
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::1

I've implemented the additional step to create the email to the Jobmaster publishing program.
It will run as part of tonight's weekly job and I'll verify the result on Monday.

Comment entered 2010-09-13 10:47:45 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-09-13 10:47:45
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::2

The new step of the automated job ran OK this weekend but I forgot to copy one of the programs to production and therefore the subject line and title of the report suggests this to be the report identifying InScopeProtocols without transfer date (report title: 'Former InScopeProtocol(s) without Transfer Date') rather then CTGovProtocols without transfer date (report title: 'Transfer Ownership to Responsible Party').

The following programs have been copied to production:
Jobmaster.py - R9890
CTGovTransferEmail.py - R9891

Comment entered 2010-09-13 11:03:22 by eckleyk

BZDATETIME::2010-09-13 11:03:22
BZCOMMENTOR::Kim Eckley
BZCOMMENT::3

(In reply to comment #2)
> The new step of the automated job ran OK this weekend but I forgot to copy one
> of the programs to production and therefore the subject line and title of the
> report suggests this to be the report identifying InScopeProtocols without
> transfer date (report title: 'Former InScopeProtocol(s) without Transfer Date')
> rather then CTGovProtocols without transfer date (report title: 'Transfer
> Ownership to Responsible Party').
> The following programs have been copied to production:
> Jobmaster.py - R9890
> CTGovTransferEmail.py - R9891

Volker - Neither Andrea or I received a new report - should there have been one?

Comment entered 2010-09-13 11:25:22 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-09-13 11:25:22
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::4

Yes, you probably did receive it but you were not able to identify it as the new report because I missed copying the program which caused the old title we had used for the manually submitted program to be displayed.

The email had the subject:
Bach: Transfer of Protocol(s) from NCI to Responsible Party
and was submitted on Saturday 1:38am.

The protocol reported was CDR63621.

Comment entered 2010-09-20 17:33:38 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-09-20 17:33:38
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::5

The report ran properly over the weekend and even displayed the correct title.

Closing issue.

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000564