Issue Number | 5317 |
---|---|
Summary | [Summaries] Analysis of SectMetaData Usage |
Created | 2024-02-01 14:20:59 |
Issue Type | Task |
Submitted By | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
Status | Closed |
Resolved | 2024-02-08 09:10:12 |
Resolution | Fixed |
Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.390296 |
We've noticed that the section metadata in our patient summaries is inconsistent. Before we try to clean this up and populate missing values, we'd like to determine if the information in the section metadata is used for anything downsteam (aside from the "Changes to Summary" section).
This ticket is for the analysis of any downsteam uses of the SectMetaData element and its children, Diagnosis and SectionType.
SectionType
and Diagnosis
Elements
in SummariesI have examined the code to find places where we use these two elements in summary sections, and this is what I found. The bottom line: as far as I can tell, there are no places where these elements are required, or which would break if the elements were removed (barring "Changes to summary").
SectionType
optional in the DTDs and schema
optionally used in advanced search
"Changes to summary [not Summary]" used in multiple scripts, filters
"Current clinical trials" used in Summary vendor filter
"Unusual Cancers Special Considerations" used in some filters
"Introductory Text" only allowed once by summary schema, publishing software
element present in multiple XMetaL summary templates
Diagnosis
optional in DTDs and schema
optionally used in advanced search
used in Summary vendor filter for adding trial search strings to sections
element present in multiple XMetaL summary templates
Elapsed: 0:00:00.000583