Issue Number | 4655 |
---|---|
Summary | [DIS] Drug Information Comprehensive Review Date Report |
Created | 2019-08-23 11:13:05 |
Issue Type | Improvement |
Submitted By | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
Status | Closed |
Resolved | 2020-06-11 17:43:58 |
Resolution | Fixed |
Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.248761 |
We'd like to develop a report to view the comprehensive review date information that will soon be added to the drug information summaries (see linked issue dependency below). It should be modeled after the Summaries Comprehensive Review Date report, which is on the Board managers page, with a few minor changes to the interface.
On the report interface, we would like to have the following same options as are on the Summaries CRD Report: Display Review Dates, ID Display, Version Display, and Report Format. In addition to these options, we would like to be able to pull up the CRD information for all of the drug information summaries, only single-agent DIS, and only combination summaries. (See the Drug Info Summaries List report for an example of how we have done this on other reports.)
The report should be added to the Drug Information Reports page in the admin menus. Thanks.
Can you confirm that the Status
and Comment
columns which appear in the existing Summaries Comprehensive Review
Date report will not be included in this report, since OCECDR-4654
is adding just a ComprehensiveReviewDate
element to the
DrugInformationSummary
schema, not the entire
ComprehensiveReview
block?
Glad you asked this question. I think it may make more sense to add the block of elements. (Actually, the status is just an attribute on the comprehensive review date element.) I'm checking with Christina on this.
OK, good news - Christina wants only the Comprehensive Review Date added. So, no need for the attribute or the comment block. Therefore, what you've proposed for this report (eliminating the status and comment columns) is fine. Thank you!
So, modify what's been done for OCECDR-4654, stripping out the
DateType
attribute?
I don't think a value is required on that attribute, so there's no harm in keeping it.
Actually, the attribute is required. Without it, we wouldn't be able
to implement the Display Review Dates field, because we
wouldn't know whether the review date were Actual
.
Unless you want to change the meaning of that field to be Show only last review date (ignoring the date type).
Let's change it to "show only last review date". Thanks!
Implemented on DEV.
It looks like the report is not on DIS menu. Could you please add it to the menu?
Installed on DEV menu.
Verified on DEV. Thanks!
It looks like the review dates are not being populated. I added a review date for 487564 and marked it as Actual but it doesn't display any date when I run the report by selecting either of the "Display Review Dates" options.
The query term definition had not been created. I took care of that and reindexed the drug docs (and added the definition to the list of manual tasks for the release). Please try again.
Yes, it is working now. Thanks!
Verified on QA. Thanks!
File Name | Posted | User |
---|---|---|
image-2020-04-16-12-30-20-796.png | 2020-04-16 12:30:21 | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
Elapsed: 0:00:00.001508