CDR Tickets

Issue Number 3246
Summary [Glossary Audio] CSS Changes to Display Media Links in GTN Documents
Created 2010-10-14 10:04:44
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Assigned To Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2010-10-28 09:45:08
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107574
Description

BZISSUE::4936
BZDATETIME::2010-10-14 10:04:44
BZCREATOR::Robin Juthe
BZASSIGNEE::Volker Englisch
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku

Now that the media link element has been added to the schema of Glossary Term Name (GTN) documents (see issue 4928), we need to modify the CSS to display the new element.

Comment entered 2010-10-15 20:26:05 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-15 20:26:05
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::1

The following CSS files have been modified to display the new MediaLink element and its child elements:
GlossaryTermName.css
Summary.css
CdrCommonSchema.css
CdrCommonSchema_structure.css
Organization.css
GlossaryTermConcept.css
Organization_structure.css
GlossaryTermConcept_structure.css

Please note, I have moved the MediaLink, MediaID, and Caption elements to the CDRCommonSchema.css, since these are used by several document types which means you should have a look at the Summary, Organization, GlossaryTermConcept, and GlossaryTermName documents to ensure these elements still look OK for all of these document types.

Comment entered 2010-10-15 20:54:32 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-15 20:54:32
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::2

The following rules files have been modified:
GlossaryTermConcept.ctm
Summary.ctm
GlossaryTermName.ctm

This is ready for review on MAHLER.

Comment entered 2010-10-19 15:34:44 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-19 15:34:44
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::3

(In reply to comment #2)
> The following rules files have been modified:
> GlossaryTermConcept.ctm
> Summary.ctm
> GlossaryTermName.ctm
>
> This is ready for review on MAHLER.

Looks good on Mahler. I also verified the element in all the document types in comment #2.

Comment entered 2010-10-19 15:55:27 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-19 15:55:27
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::4

Did you want me to move this to BACH or are we waiting for other changes to be moved first?

Comment entered 2010-10-19 16:01:01 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-19 16:01:01
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::5

(In reply to comment #4)
> Did you want me to move this to BACH or are we waiting for other changes to be
> moved first?

I was under the impression that OCECDR-3232 needs to be promoted to Bach before this one but if this bug can precede OCECDR-3232 then I think you can proceed to move it Bach. 4920 is ready to be promoted anyway.

Comment entered 2010-10-19 18:39:11 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-19 18:39:11
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::6

> I was under the impression that OCECDR-3232 needs to be promoted to
> Bach before this one

No, CSS files can be copied independently. They don't break anything if they are on BACH before the schema is there but you won't be able to verify that the new elements are working without the modified schema.

The following CSS files have been copied to FRANCK and BACH:
GlossaryTermName.css - R9928
Summary.css - R9928
CdrCommonSchema.css - R9928
CdrCommonSchema_structure.css - R9928
Organization.css - R9928
GlossaryTermConcept.css - R9928
Organization_structure.css - R9928
GlossaryTermConcept_structure.css - R9928

The following rules files have been copied to FRANCK and BACH:
GlossaryTermConcept.ctm - R9929
Summary.ctm - R9929
GlossaryTermName.ctm - R9929

Please verify on BACH and close this bug.

Comment entered 2010-10-26 13:44:36 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-26 13:44:36
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::7

(In reply to comment #6)
> Please verify on BACH and close this bug.

The elements do not appear to display the same way they did on Mahler when I tested. It does not look like the CSS has been applied.

Comment entered 2010-10-27 17:49:11 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-27 17:49:11
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::8

You're right. I forgot to copy a file.

Please check again on BACH.

Comment entered 2010-10-28 09:45:08 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-10-28 09:45:08
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::9

(In reply to comment #8)
> You're right. I forgot to copy a file.
>
> Please check again on BACH.

Verified. Issue closed.

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000580