| Issue Number | 554 |
|---|---|
| Summary | [Reports] Citations by Tag - Treat Assigned for Review as a State in Report Output |
| Created | 2020-03-02 14:05:38 |
| Issue Type | Improvement |
| Submitted By | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
| Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Status | Closed |
| Resolved | 2020-08-10 09:18:50 |
| Resolution | Fixed |
| Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/oceebms/issue.257640 |
We'd like to indicate in the Article State column which of the "Passed full text review" articles have been assigned for review/included in a packet. For articles that are at the passed full text review state, please display "Assigned for Review: " followed by the name of the packet in the article state column, rather than displaying "passed full text review".
I've linked this issue to the original report request (OCEEBMS-540) in case we want to refer back to it.
For articles that are at the passed full text review state ...
So articles in that state which don't have a packet yet are dropped from the report?
No, we'd like to keep those on the report. So articles that are at the passed full text review state could have two different values in the "Current Article State" column of the report. Either they are "passed full text review" (meaning they haven't been included in a packet yet), or they are "Assigned for review: name of packet" in which case they are currently in a packet awaiting review.
Implemented on DEV and QA2 (the new servers, so ebms-dev and ebms-qa2). Would I be right in assuming you wanted me to skip packets which are not active, or for which the article has been marked as dropped from the packet?
Verified on QA.
Verified on PROD. Closing issue.
Elapsed: 0:00:00.000715