Issue Number | 4482 |
---|---|
Summary | [Summaries] Remove Gray Background and Underlining from All Comments in QC Reports |
Created | 2018-05-25 15:32:57 |
Issue Type | Improvement |
Submitted By | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
Assigned To | Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C] |
Status | Closed |
Resolved | 2018-06-14 18:10:16 |
Resolution | Fixed |
Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.226720 |
Some comments display on RLSO or B/U QC reports with a gray background. This makes them more difficult to read, and it appears to be inconsistent. We haven't been able to identify the pattern of when the gray background appears and when it doesn't appear, but we'd like to remove the gray background from all comments. Additionally, some comments are underlined (I think when they are within insertion elements?). We would like to remove this underlining too. Thanks!
Would you have a sample document including a comment with grey background?
We haven't been able to identify the pattern of when the gray background appears and when it doesn't appear
Internal comments are displayed with a gray background.
Additionally, some comments are underlined (I think when they are within insertion elements?). We would like to remove this underlining too.
That's correct! Comments within insertion markup are underlined and comments within deletion markup are strikethrough (or is it struckthrough?).
Do you only want the underline removed from the underlined comments as listed in your description or also the strikethrough removed from the comments within deleted sections, ~juther?
I don't think it's just internal comments. I will post an example of a summary that includes an external comment with a gray background. (CDR62863 on PROD) See page 38 for example. There are several external comments on that page and the next several pages that have a gray background (I think because they are within an insertion element?).
Let's just remove the underlining. Chances are if the comment is within the deleted section, it should also be deleted. Thanks.
I have the feeling we're going to have fun with this ticket. :-)
On which server did you create this report? DEV, QA, or PROD?
on PROD
I see. You're trying to make things difficult. :-)
I was trying to recreate the report but now I see the comment you're referring to is within proposed text and I didn't include proposed markup in my QC report.
I see now that we've used gray background for two types of comments:
Internal comments and
Proposed comments
Since both, comments and proposed text are displayed bold in the BU reports we added the gray background to have the comments stand out. The green in XMetaL stands out enough to quickly identify a comment but that's harder to do without color.
The underline and gray background have been removed from the comments. The following files have been updated:
CDR380956: Module: STYLE RS Insertion Deletion
CDR380957: Module: STYLE BU Insertion Deletion
Committed to local repository: [ising 3f71eda5]
This is ready for review on DEV.
This looks pretty good, although comments located within approved markup are still underlined. Would it be possible to remove the underlining from those comments and responses to comments? thanks.
Could you let me know which document(s) you were looking at on DEV? I don't think I was seeing any publish markup.
I wasn't looking at any publish markup either but there's approved markup (with comments inside it) in the Genetics of CRC summary (CDR62863).
RS or BU report?
Adjusting story points since this ticket will need some filter changes rather than a few simple CSS modifications.
I've adjusted the display of comments within Insertion markup.
CDR0000380956.xml: Module: STYLE BU Insertion Deletion
We're getting close. 🙂 However, comments within approved insertion elements that have an Advisory Board source are still underlined (and also displayed with expanded character spacing). We'd like the text of these comments to appear just like other comments - no underlining, italicized, but not expanded character spacing. Sorry to be so picky! thank you. There's a sample marked up in the first paragraph of the Genetics of CRC summary on DEV (CDR62863).
We never talked about the font style (italics) or font spacing. You still want comments to be displayed bolded everywhere and in addition struck when it's within deletion markup and this should be the same for every revision level and source, right?
Yes, that's right. All comments should be italicized and bold with regular spacing for every source. But the ones in deletion markup should be struck through. Clear as mud? ;-)
Good thing I'm asking. I understood from your last comment that you wanted to eliminate italics, too, but that's not the case.
This should be the same for the RS reports with the difference of red text color for comments within inserted text, correct?
That's correct!
The comments have been adjusted according to your specifications, ~juther. The two style filters have been updated:
CDR380956: Module: STYLE RS Insertion Deletion
CDR380957: Module: STYLE BU Insertion Deletion
https://github.com/NCIOCPL/cdr-server/commit/9d631ca
This is ready for review on DEV.
I have prepared CDR62902 with all possible combinations of comments to
display; with, without markup, Insertion/Deletion markup, editorial
board/advisory board comments, proposed/approved text, etc.
~vshields, did you have a chance to look at these changes on DEV before we're finishing up development for Ising?
Margaret and I looked at these changes on DEV and think they look good. Thanks!!
QA verified.
File Name | Posted | User |
---|---|---|
Genetics of Colorectal Cancer for WG 6_1_18.docx | 2018-06-06 17:36:45 | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
Elapsed: 0:00:00.001389