CDR Tickets

Issue Number 3944
Summary [Summaries] Identifying Key References
Created 2015-07-17 18:00:20
Issue Type New Feature
Submitted By Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Assigned To Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Status Closed
Resolved 2018-02-08 14:29:25
Resolution Won't Fix
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.165467
Description

The Adult Treatment Board is interested in identifying "key" references in their summaries - approx. 10 or so references that are crucial to understanding the treatment of each cancer. This needs more discussion before a solution is implemented, so I'm adding the issue to encourage us to do just that.

Comment entered 2015-07-17 18:03:49 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

I should mention that the goal is to make this designation visible on Cancer.gov so readers can quickly see what the Board deems to be the most important references on that topic.

Comment entered 2015-08-13 14:08:58 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

This would be for health professional summaries. Possibly with some way to get to the information on the web site. Maybe add an attribute to the citation links in the summaries.

Comment entered 2015-08-13 14:16:18 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

This would be for health professional summaries. Possibly with some way to get to the information on the web site. We discussed the approach of adding a separate block in the summary schema for KeyCitations, with KeyCitation children. This way, the citations could be ordered by importance. The approach also avoids problems introduced if we were to implement this by adding an attribute to the existing citations (some citations appear in multiple places in the summary). Consider implementing a voting system in the EBMS, or some other mechanism for board members to flag citations they think of as key references.

<KeyCitations>
 <KeyCitation cdr:ref="CDR...">
  <Comment>...</Comment>
  <Comment>...</Comment>
 </KeyCitation>
 ...
</KeyCitations>
Comment entered 2015-11-17 13:39:46 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

KeyCitations block added on DEV.

Comment entered 2015-11-17 14:14:03 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Had to change the KeyCitation's linking attribute from cdr:ref to cdr:href - otherwise our Comments get replaced with the document titles for the citations.

Comment entered 2015-11-19 08:14:20 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

You'll need a ticket for Volker to format the display of the new elements in XMetaL (and perhaps one for the QC report).

Comment entered 2016-03-03 15:09:11 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

We'd like to back out these changes from version control. We'll consider doing something with key references in the next CDR release.

Comment entered 2016-03-23 18:25:53 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Hi Bob, just a reminder that we decided to back out this change from Darwin. Thanks.

Comment entered 2016-03-24 13:27:33 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Backed out of DEV and SVN.

Comment entered 2016-03-31 14:34:20 by Learn, Blair (NIH/NCI) [C]

From status meeting: Removed from Darwin, users will reassess what's needed.

Comment entered 2017-08-09 08:45:42 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

I'm moving this into Gauss, based on Robin's comment on March 3 of last year. Though perhaps that's wrong, since it was not included in Einstein. Let me know if this should be closed instead, .

Elapsed: 0:00:00.001360