CDR Tickets

Issue Number 3143
Summary [CTgov Transfer] Modify Transfer of Protocol(s) from NCI to Responsible Party” email report
Created 2010-05-07 11:49:02
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]
Assigned To Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2010-06-01 11:17:30
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107471
Description

BZISSUE::4826
BZDATETIME::2010-05-07 11:49:02
BZCREATOR::William Osei-Poku
BZASSIGNEE::Volker Englisch
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku

Add the CurrentProtocolStatus of each transferred trial to the “Transfer of Protocol(s) from NCI to Responsible Party” email report.

When a document that has been marked for transfer is checked out to a user, report this in the “Transfer of Protocol(s) from NCI to Responsible Party” email report. This item should have its own paragraph in the email and not be a separate column in the email.

Comment entered 2010-05-10 17:51:04 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-10 17:51:04
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::1

Adding dependency.

Comment entered 2010-05-25 18:39:38 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-25 18:39:38
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::2

(In reply to comment #0)
> When a document that has been marked for transfer is checked out to a user,
> report this in the “Transfer of Protocol(s) from NCI to Responsible Party”
> email report.

What information would you like to see here?
I'm guessing CDR-ID, UserName.
Is there any other information you'd like to have included?

Comment entered 2010-05-26 12:15:25 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-26 12:15:25
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::3

(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > When a document that has been marked for transfer is checked out to a user,
> > report this in the “Transfer of Protocol(s) from NCI to Responsible Party”
> > email report.
>
> What information would you like to see here?
> I'm guessing CDR-ID, UserName.
> Is there any other information you'd like to have included?

That is all the information we need. Thanks!

Comment entered 2010-05-28 13:45:35 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-28 13:45:35
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::4

I've forwarded the sample email output to William.

William, would you like me to put this in production?
I'm not sure how you would want to verify this on BACH unless you would want to purposely lock one document.

Comment entered 2010-05-28 13:49:05 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-28 13:49:05
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::5

(In reply to comment #4)
> I've forwarded the sample email output to William.
>
> William, would you like me to put this in production?
> I'm not sure how you would want to verify this on BACH unless you would want to
> purposely lock one document.

Please put in production. At least the status column will now show.

Comment entered 2010-05-28 13:49:56 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-28 13:49:56
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::6

Just remembered another question I wanted to ask you:
This change only takes care of the email that's been created as part of the publishing job, not the one that's submitted in case a publishing job failed and this had to be run manually.

Did you want the other report to be modified as well?
The other report is sort of the same thing but it's looking at CTGovProtocols instead of InScopeProtocols. That's why I didn't make this change to the other report as well.

Comment entered 2010-05-28 13:59:57 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-28 13:59:57
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::7

(In reply to comment #6)
> Just remembered another question I wanted to ask you:
> This change only takes care of the email that's been created as part of the
> publishing job, not the one that's submitted in case a publishing job failed
> and this had to be run manually.
>
> Did you want the other report to be modified as well?
> The other report is sort of the same thing but it's looking at CTGovProtocols
> instead of InScopeProtocols. That's why I didn't make this change to the other
> report as well.

I agree that you don't make changes to this report because it can be misleading to display the status from the converted ctgov document as sometimes, the status is different from what is in the InScope document. Also, with regards to the locked document, I can rely on the ctgov downloaded report for that.

Comment entered 2010-05-28 14:12:14 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-05-28 14:12:14
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::8

The following program has been copied to FRANCK and BACH:
CheckCTGovTransfer.py - R9647

Please verify on BACH and close this bug.

Comment entered 2010-06-01 11:17:30 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-06-01 11:17:30
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::9

(In reply to comment #8)
> The following program has been copied to FRANCK and BACH:
> CheckCTGovTransfer.py - R9647
>
> Please verify on BACH and close this bug.

Verified. Issue Closed. Thanks!

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000538