CDR Tickets

BZISSUE::4750
BZDATETIME::2010-02-03 13:20:58
BZCREATOR::William Osei-Poku
BZASSIGNEE::Bob Kline
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku

The trials listed below were transferred back into NCI ownership. These are the trials we discussed on Friday needing to determine how we would get an inscope version published. Any solutions at this point?

Kim

Kimberly A. Eckley, MA, PMP
Lockheed Martin (Contractor)
Program Manager - NCI-Clinical Trials Reporting Office Support

301-519-6511 - office
kimberly.a.eckley@lmco.com

---Original Message---
From: Jackson, Andrea
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:30 PM
To: Eckley, Kimberly A
Subject: FW: transfer records back to NCI

FYI - the ECOG trials

---Original Message---
From: register@clinicaltrials.gov register@clinicaltrials.gov
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:27 PM
To: Jackson, Andrea
Subject: Re: transfer records back to NCI

Done.

Thank you,
PRS Team
ClinicalTrials.gov

Investigator's Login Page: http://register.clinicaltrials.gov
Investigator's Information Page: http://prsinfo.clinicaltrials.gov

Jackson, Andrea wrote:
>
> Can you please transfer ownership of the trials below back to NCI's
> account? Please let me know if you need additional information.
>
>
>
> NCT00433511; CDR0000528955; ECOG-E5103
>
> NCT00098787; CDR0000398096; ECOG-E4203
>
> NCT00045305; CDR0000256928; ECOG-E1902
>
> NCT00262925; CDR0000450765; ECOG-E1904
>
> NCT00387699; CDR0000508653; ECOG-E1506
>
> NCT00002667; CDR0000064256; E-5593
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrea
>

Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
>> Can't hurt, though I don't know enough about how closely their test
>> system (PRS) mirrors the live system
>>
>
> Their systems are similar to what we have with BACH and FRANCK. The systems are almost identical but the data on the test system is usually a couple of months old.
>
> Looking at this task I am wondering if these protocols that are being transferred back will be back permanently or is there a possibility they will be transferred to CT.gov again?
>

In theory, that's what's supposed to happen eventually (of course, in
theory they should all have been transferred by the end of December),
but in this context I'd say anything could happen.

> I'm not certain that all reports looking at transferred protocols have been written to accommodate this back-and-forth and back-and-forth situation.
>
> I'll start the FRANCK refresh shortly.
>
>

Thanks.

--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:bkline@rksystems.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Grama, Lakshmi (NIH/NCI) [E] lgrama@mail.nih.gov
Sent: Wed 2/3/2010 10:45 AM
To: Osei-Poku, William; Kline, Robert (NCI)
Subject: RE: FW: transfer records back to NCI

That would be a good idea

---Original Message---
From: Osei-Poku, William wOsei-Poku@icfi.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 11:44 AM
To: Kline, Robert (NCI)
Cc: Grama, Lakshmi (NIH/NCI) [E]
Subject: RE: FW: transfer records back to NCI

Should we test this on Franck before implementing it on Bach? I believe
we need to test whether publishing to cancer.gov and uploading to the
PRS system (CTGov) wouldn't be a problem?

---Original Message---
From: Bob Kline bkline@rksystems.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Osei-Poku, William
Cc: Grama, Lakshmi (NIH/NCI) [E]
Subject: Re: FW: transfer records back to NCI

On 2/2/2010 2:42 PM, Osei-Poku, William wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> The trials below are transferred trials that have gone through the
> conversion process. However, we are reversing the transfer and taking
> back ownership of the trials. What we need is to be able to have the
> last publishable version of the Inscope trial to become the current
> working document. What is the appropriate way to go about this? We
> already have a tool that can promote previous versions to become CWDs
> but I am guessing you still need to make additional changes for these
to
> be published to cancer.gov and ctgov without problems?
>

Arrgh! This is getting so complicated my brain is starting to melt! I
think it will work to bring up the last publishable InScopeProtocol
version and make it into the latest publishable version (making sure you

incorporate any changes which have occurred in the trial since the
transfer). Can you think of any pitfalls, Lakshmi? Given our track
record for anticipating all the ways in which this Rube Goldberg system
can do something unexpected, I'm not 100% confident I've thought of
everything that could go wrong.

--
Bob Kline
http://www.rksystems.com
mailto:bkline@rksystems.com