EBMS Tickets

Issue Number 84
Summary [Full Citation] Use consistent date format
Created 2013-10-31 09:57:36
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Assigned To Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2013-12-21 14:21:09
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/oceebms/issue.114397
Description

We've noticed that some date fields present the date as MM/DD/YYYY and others present it as YYYY/MM/DD. We'd like all of them to display the date as YYYY/MM/DD. We'll come up with a list of the changes.

Comment entered 2013-10-31 10:13:19 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

If we're moving toward standardizing the format, you might want to consider using the official (ISO) standard:

YYYY-MM-DD

Just a thought. :-)

Comment entered 2013-11-06 14:03:25 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Yes, agreed. We should use the ISO format.

This will involve changing all of the dates on the full citation page to the new format so it probably isn't worth pointing out inconsistencies in the current format now. The date should also be in the ISO format when we click on "add decision" on the full citation page and a date appears next to each possible decision that could be added.

Comment entered 2013-12-21 14:21:09 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Implemented on DEV.

  • R12194 modules/custom/ebms/citations.inc

Comment entered 2014-01-06 00:50:58 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Promoted to QA.

Comment entered 2014-01-16 08:56:41 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Verified on QA.

Comment entered 2014-02-19 11:01:58 by Ferguson, Bonnie (NIH/NCI) [C] [X]

verified in production 2/19/14

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000693