| Issue Number | 578 |
|---|---|
| Summary | New Citation Report - Citations Reviewed by Medical Librarian |
| Created | 2020-10-15 14:18:33 |
| Issue Type | New Feature |
| Submitted By | Boggess, Cynthia (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Status | Closed |
| Resolved | 2021-07-14 16:10:38 |
| Resolution | Fixed |
| Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/oceebms/issue.276623 |
We would like to request a citation report to be added to the EBMS Citation Reports. This new report would generate statistics regarding the number of citations that are reviewed by the Medical Librarian – specifically the number of citations that have been flagged for the Medical Librarians queue for a given review cycle. This report should be similar in layout as the current "Citations Imported" or "Citations Published" reports displaying statistics for the board and its summary topics with options to generate statistics by Board and by review cycle. This report should be named "Citations Reviewed by Medical Librarian". When a user does not specify a board, display all boards and summary topics and the grand total for all boards at the bottom of the report.
Can you explain what the difference would be between this new report and the Citations Rejected/Accepted for Publishing report on the https://ebms.nci.nih.gov/reports/citations page?
(Answering my own question) I think this one just collapses the ACCEPTED and REJECTED columns into a single REVIEWED column, right?
Implemented on EBMS DEV.
Pretty much...the number of citations that land in the med librarian review queue that then get rejected or accepted.
Another way to look at it is the number of citations ready for review after the NOT journal filters are applied upon import.
Just so we're 100% clear: "number of citations ready for review after the NOT journal filters are applied upon import" and "number of citations that are reviewed by the medical librarian" are not necessarily the same numbers at any given moment in time. The number used in this report is the latter, because that's what the title and description for this ticket ask for. If an article is ready for review, and that review hasn't yet taken place, the article isn't counted by this report.
Exactly, will be reviewed and reviewed is just a matter of time.
But yes the latter.
I'm sorry, I'm going to make myself into a really annoying pest, because I'm still concerned that we might not have the same picture of what this report is going to do. The report is not going to include articles that are in the "will be reviewed" state at the time the report is run. Let's take an example.
You import 100 new articles on Monday, and they land in your queue for review
You run the report on Tuesday
You review the articles on Wednesday, approving some and rejecting the rest
You run the report on Thursday
The report you run on Tuesday will NOT include those 100 articles, even though you're correct in saying it's "just a matter of time" before they're eventually reviewed. Thursday's report WILL count those articles.
Yes, thanks for the clarification. We want the reviewed state count for this report.
😃 👍
verified on dev
verified on QA
Verified on PROD. Thanks!
Closing ticket.
| File Name | Posted | User |
|---|---|---|
| NewCitationReportscrshot.docx | 2020-10-15 14:17:51 | Boggess, Cynthia (NIH/NCI) [C] |
Elapsed: 0:00:00.000398