EBMS Tickets

Issue Number 538
Summary [Adhoc Query] Comment Field Analysis
Created 2020-01-16 21:06:09
Issue Type Task
Submitted By Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Assigned To Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2020-01-21 10:20:27
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/oceebms/issue.255260
Description

As I mentioned in today's meeting, we would like to get a better sense of how we have used the various comment fields that are associated with an article in the EBMS to determine if we should remove any of the fields and to also inform which fields should be displayed on reports and/or searchable on the search database page. I've listed the available comment fields I could think of, but please let me know if you come across others.

 

Import comments

State comments (associated with medical librarian initial review, published, abstract review, full text retrieved, full text review, board manager action, on agenda, editorial board decision)

Tag comments

Board manager comments

Board member responses

 

Maybe this initial analysis could just give numbers for the number of times each comment field has been used? I expect we'll want to see how they are used but maybe that would give us a better sense of where to focus. Let me know if you have other ideas - I think you understand what we're after and I don't want to ask for anything too complicated. Thanks.

Comment entered 2020-01-17 09:33:43 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]
   16771 ebms_article_review.comments
   75734 ebms_article_state_comment.comment
   93321 ebms_article_tag_comment.comment
     293 ebms_article_topic_comment.comment
     863 ebms_ft_unavailable.comment
    4378 ebms_import_batch.comment
      11 ebms_internal_article_comment.comment_text
     133 ebms_print_job.comment
      24 ebms_related_article.comment
       6 ebms_tag.tag_comment
       0 ebms_hotel_request.notes
       0 ebms_reimbursement_request.notes
     633 ebms_summary_posted_doc.notes
     375 ebms_summary_returned_doc.notes
       3 ebms_summary_supporting_doc.notes
Comment entered 2020-01-23 11:37:07 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Thanks, Bob. Based on this analysis, I think the first four sets of comments are what we're most interested in. Would it be possible to generate a sample set of the comments contained in those fields (maybe 100 comments of each type listed below?).

16771 ebms_article_review.comments
75734 ebms_article_state_comment.comment
93321 ebms_article_tag_comment.comment
293 ebms_article_topic_comment.comment

Comment entered 2020-01-23 16:52:41 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

I think what I've given you is even more useful. Four sheets, one for each of those tables, with each unique normalized comment and the number of times that comment occurs, with the most frequently-occurring comments at the top.

Comment entered 2020-03-25 14:37:13 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

This was very useful and helpful in putting together the requirements for the Citations by Tag report. Thank you!

Attachments
File Name Posted User
oceebms-538.xlsx 2020-01-23 16:51:25 Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000702