| Issue Number | 4707 |
|---|---|
| Summary | [Citation] Modified PubMed Documents report |
| Created | 2019-11-14 16:59:52 |
| Issue Type | Bug |
| Submitted By | Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Status | Closed |
| Resolved | 2020-04-27 14:35:50 |
| Resolution | Fixed |
| Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.252379 |
The Modified PubMed Documents report is empty. The only one that shows up is the one we just modified. I am wondering if the report should contain all PubMed documents that have been modified instead of just the most recent ones?
Looks like ModifiedRecord was one of the elements
dropped during the Citation
streamlining: https://tracker.nci.nih.gov/secure/attachment/134190/pubmed-paths_RJ_CIAT.xlsx
The "Fix Version" doesn't get set until the work is done. I think you meant to set the sprint to Leibniz. I've taken care of fixing it.
Thank you! 😃
What's the plan for this one? Would you prefer
Restore the ModifiedRecord element in the schema and
the import and let it kick in for future reports?
Switch to using the audit table to show documents which were recently saved?
Option 1 is preferred. Thanks!
~oseipokuw, I'm a little puzzled about what actually needs to be done. The picture I have is that
ModifiedRecord is still in the schema as an optional
Yes text element
The element is populated by CIAT, not imported from NLM
We stripped them out recently as part of streamlining of the {{Citation}}s
If I add a ModifiedRecord element to a
Citation document, it shows up on the report
Do we need to do anything for this ticket except remind ourselves not to do another wholesale wiping out of the elements in another future global change? I can imagine that if you re-import a PubMed article that element would be dropped, but that would be appropriate, would it not, since the PubMed article information, having been re-imported over what you might have changed, would no longer be modified, right?
After discussions with the Citations team, this is a report we can get rid of. It is not used for anything other than to keep a history of PubMed citations that have been modified. No further action is taken based on the data and it is not reported anywhere else. I assume we can always retrieve this data with an ad hoc query in the future if we should need it. So, I am proposing removing the report from the reports menu.
Report has been retired (on DEV and in version control).
Verified on QA. Thanks!
Elapsed: 0:00:00.001665