CDR Tickets

Issue Number 3439
Summary [Mobile] Submit Change Notification to PDQ Vendors
Created 2011-11-01 11:24:29
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Assigned To Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2011-11-03 13:23:40
Resolution Won't Fix
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107767
Description

BZISSUE::5133
BZDATETIME::2011-11-01 11:24:29
BZCREATOR::Volker Englisch
BZASSIGNEE::Volker Englisch
BZQACONTACT::Margaret Beckwith

We will need to prepare and submit a notification of upcoming changes regarding the new "mobile" attribute to the vendors.

Comment entered 2011-11-01 16:31:58 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2011-11-01 16:31:58
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::1

Lakshmi talked to me today and said that the mobile information should not go out to the licensees. This means we won't need to make any changes to the licensee DTD but we'll need to adjust our post-processing filters to remove all mobile related tags.

Comment entered 2011-11-01 17:05:40 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2011-11-01 17:05:40
BZCOMMENTOR::Bob Kline
BZCOMMENT::2

(In reply to comment #1)
> Lakshmi talked to me today and said that the mobile information should not go
> out to the licensees. This means we won't need to make any changes to the
> licensee DTD but we'll need to adjust our post-processing filters to remove all
> mobile related tags.

Is that really what we want to do? If we just strip out the markup, they'll end up getting duplicate paragraphs (and other duplicate content). It would seem instead that to make this transparent for the licensees, we'd have to replicate the logic Blair's going to need to implement to suppress content which is not targeted to the "screen" device (which means you'll need to handle both "include" and "exclude" logic, as well as nested filtering).

Comment entered 2011-11-01 17:09:08 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2011-11-01 17:09:08
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::3

(In reply to comment #2)
> It would
> seem instead that to make this transparent for the licensees, we'd have to
> replicate the logic Blair's going to need to implement

That's correct. We need to create "screen only" output for the licensees.

Comment entered 2011-11-01 17:22:57 by Grama, Lakshmi (NIH/NCI) [E]

BZDATETIME::2011-11-01 17:22:57
BZCOMMENTOR::Lakshmi Grama
BZCOMMENT::4

The decisions we made for mobile related to content presented on NCI's mobile web site. I am concerned that content tagged to be excluded from mobile (such as More Information or About PDQ section in summaries) would be excluded from vendor implementation of mobile as well without the NCI context. I don't feel comfortable with content partners not showing these sections in their implementation.

Comment entered 2011-11-03 13:23:40 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2011-11-03 13:23:40
BZCOMMENTOR::Bob Kline
BZCOMMENT::5

We're going to make this change transparent to the vendors by replicating Blair's logic for selecting screen output.

Elapsed: 0:00:00.001877