Issue Number | 3437 |
---|---|
Summary | [CiteMS] Ad hoc query for rejected documents |
Created | 2011-10-26 15:10:00 |
Issue Type | Improvement |
Submitted By | Beckwith, Margaret (NIH/NCI) [E] |
Assigned To | alan |
Status | Closed |
Resolved | 2011-11-02 10:12:23 |
Resolution | Fixed |
Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107765 |
BZISSUE::5131
BZDATETIME::2011-10-26 15:10:00
BZCREATOR::Margaret Beckwith
BZASSIGNEE::Alan Meyer
BZQACONTACT::Margaret Beckwith
I would like to try and get a number of citations rejected by the CIAT staff before publishing to the CiteMS for the year 2010. Here is an email from Cynthia that explains a little more clearly what I need:
"The number of citations published [to the CiteMS] is slightly
inflated due to fast tracking but the number that is giving you the most
concern is the number of citations rejected. The number of citations
retrieved and published are generated differently than the number of
citations rejected. The number of citations retrieved and published is a
count of individual unique citation records. The number of citations
rejected is a count of summary topic assignments rejected. For example,
a citation assigned 6 summary topics…if I reject all 6 summary topics
then this counts as 6 rejections. If I accept 3 and reject 3, this
counts as 3 rejections but only 1 published citation. And since most
citations in the CiteMS are assigned multiple summary topics, the number
rejected is going to seem incorrect unless you are looking at it broken
down by summary topic or at least by board.
You could ask Alan to run an ad hoc query of the database to look for
any citation from 2010 that has at least one rejected summary topic and
use that number instead. This number will not be completely accurate
since many of the citations with one rejected topic may have several
others that were accepted. Because the number of citations rejected is
summary topic dependant, these sorts of generalized statistics lose
value."
We can discuss this at the meeting and see how difficult it would be to do. I am not sure it is really going to give me exactly what I am looking for.
BZDATETIME::2011-10-27 12:21:59
BZCOMMENTOR::Margaret Beckwith
BZCOMMENT::1
Attached this document so that we could refer to the table with literature surveillance numbers.
Attachment The PDQ History and Editorial Processes_Final.docx has been added with description: Document describing PDQ literature surveillance processes
BZDATETIME::2011-11-02 10:12:09
BZCOMMENTOR::Margaret Beckwith
BZCOMMENT::2
Don't need report after all, so I am closing the issue.
BZDATETIME::2011-11-02 10:12:23
BZCOMMENTOR::Margaret Beckwith
BZCOMMENT::3
Closing issue.
File Name | Posted | User |
---|---|---|
The PDQ History and Editorial Processes_Final.docx | 2011-10-27 12:21:59 |
Elapsed: 0:00:00.002392