| Issue Number | 3361 |
|---|---|
| Summary | [Media] Possible New Element to describe Media Category? |
| Created | 2011-05-17 16:56:24 |
| Issue Type | Improvement |
| Submitted By | Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E] |
| Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Status | Closed |
| Resolved | 2011-05-20 09:43:45 |
| Resolution | Won't Fix |
| Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107689 |
BZISSUE::5054
BZDATETIME::2011-05-17 16:56:24
BZCREATOR::Robin Juthe
BZASSIGNEE::Bob Kline
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku
As mentioned in the last status meeting, we have come to use the "category" element in the media documents in a couple different ways. Originally, this element was used to describe the category of illustration (e.g., anatomy, test or procedure, staging), but since we are now using media docs to house items such as meeting recordings and audio pronunciations, we have added these two items to the "category" list. These values aren't really equivalent to the illustration types, so we would like to talk in the next meeting about possibly adding another element to the media document schema to describe the type of file (e.g., illustration, meeting recording, pronunciation), or other ideas for how we might be more consistent in how we use the category element.
BZDATETIME::2011-05-20 09:42:34
BZCOMMENTOR::Bob Kline
BZCOMMENT::1
We discussed this in yesterday's meeting, and decided to stick with the single element.
BZDATETIME::2011-05-20 09:43:45
BZCOMMENTOR::Robin Juthe
BZCOMMENT::2
That's right. We'll add separate issues for modifying media document reports. Closing this issue.
Elapsed: 0:00:00.001481