| Issue Number | 2603 |
|---|---|
| Summary | XMetal macro needs to be modified |
| Created | 2008-07-31 15:10:39 |
| Issue Type | Improvement |
| Submitted By | priced |
| Assigned To | Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C] |
| Status | Closed |
| Resolved | 2013-07-11 19:07:19 |
| Resolution | Won't Fix |
| Path | /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.106931 |
BZISSUE::4230
BZDATETIME::2008-07-31 15:10:39
BZCREATOR::Sheri Khanna
BZASSIGNEE::Bob Kline
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku
We need the XMetal macro to be modified so that it picks up the Fragment ID's for the ResponsibleParty/ResponsibleOrganization/Organization element.
BZDATETIME::2008-08-11 12:46:57
BZCOMMENTOR::Bob Kline
BZCOMMENT::1
If I remember correctly, we said we were going to cancel or postpone the work on this request, given the low frequency of organizations as responsible parties and the availability of another technique to copy and paste the link fragment. Does this match what others remember?
BZDATETIME::2008-08-13 17:03:57
BZCOMMENTOR::Sheri Khanna
BZCOMMENT::2
(In reply to comment #1)
> If I remember correctly, we said we were going to cancel or
postpone the work
> on this request, given the low frequency of organizations as
responsible
> parties and the availability of another technique to copy and paste
the link
> fragment. Does this match what others remember?
Yes. We are just entering the Responsible Party element in the CDR and so far, the frequency of Responsible Organizations to Responsible Persons has been lower and we can copy and paste the fragment link as an alternative.
I would like to lower the priority on this issue for now. If the
frequency of Organizations changes in the near future, we may want to
change the priority.
If not, we can close it later.
BZDATETIME::2009-06-30 09:38:36
BZCOMMENTOR::Bob Kline
BZCOMMENT::3
Making room for a more even distribution of tasks users really want us to work on (currently half of my tasks are clumped at the same P5 priority).
BZDATETIME::2010-10-01 10:37:18
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::4
I would suggest to just close this P10 task. It didn't seem to be a need for CIAT in over two years.
BZDATETIME::2012-01-03 10:38:01
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::5
William, this issue was submitted by Sheri Khanna and is a P10 for over 2 years.
Could you please identify if there is still a need for the change and, if that's not the case, close the issue?
BZDATETIME::2012-01-03 10:39:31
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::6
Actually, since the previous question was addressed to William I should probably first add William to this issue.
As discussed at the weekly status meeting this issue won't be addressed in the foreseeable future.
Elapsed: 0:00:00.001375