CDR Tickets

Issue Number 5046
Summary Add ability to remove PDQ branding from SVPC Summary page titles
Created 2021-10-15 14:16:21
Issue Type New Feature
Submitted By Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]
Assigned To Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2021-10-25 15:00:39
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.300669
Description

As a CDR patient summary editor, I want the ability to publish a SVPC summary without the PDQ branding in the title, so that we can create patient content tailored for SEO on Cancer.gov (SVPC).

Currently, the PDQ branding is appended to the summary title for all summaries created in the CDR and published to cancer.gov. We would like to add the ability to remove this branding from the page title for SVPC summaries. This will make SVPC summaries published to Cancer.gov not display with the PDQ branding.

 

Scenario: CDR has ability to remove PDQ branding from page titles

  Given I am a CDR patient summary editor

    And I have permissions to create SVPC summaries in the CDR

    And I create a new SVPC summary

  When I publish the summary

  Then the CDR should not append the PDQ branding to the page title of the summary

Comment entered 2021-10-15 19:57:57 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

This ticket requests to remove the PDQ branding from the SVPC summaries.

Are we still keeping the PDQ branding for the partner summary documents or are we going to remove the branding from those documents as well?

Additionally, I am wondering if it is only the PDQ branding we are removing or any of the other parts the filter is adding?  In other words, are we still adding the audience and the dash to the title?

  • SummaryTitle:  
    Adult Primary Liver Cancer Treatment

  • Current Cancer.gov Title:  
    Adult Primary Liver Cancer Treatment (PDQ®)–Patient Version

  • New Cancer.gov Title:
    Adult Primary Liver Cancer Treatment–Patient Version

Is the new title what is expected for this ticket?

Comment entered 2021-10-15 19:59:09 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

For my information:

The template "SummaryTitle" in filter CDR157 needs to be modified.

Comment entered 2021-10-21 14:05:02 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Decided in today's status meeting that the branding will be stripped from the partner document, not just for the SVPC summaries sent to the web site. This does not apply to other summaries not yet affected by this project. They will continue to get the branding.

Comment entered 2021-10-22 12:57:19 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

The following filters have been modified to remove the branding from the SVPC document titles:

  • CDR000157 - Vendor Filter: Summary

  • CDR335416 - Denormalization Filter: Summary Reference De-Dup

  • CDR335424 - Denormalization Filter: Summary

  • CDR335425 - Denormalization Filter: Summary Citation Formatting

  • CDR335428 - Denormalization Filter: Summary Reference List

  • CDR780696 - Denormalization Filter: Summary GlossaryTerm

https://github.com/NCIOCPL/cdr-server/commit/6ee627a

I will finish up removal of the branding from the partner documents once OCECDR-5053 has been addressed.

Comment entered 2021-10-25 15:00:22 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

There were minor changes to the following filter:

We do now suppress the " PDQ((r))" string from the SVPC Partner output and the individual SVPC summaries while keeping the branding for all other (legacy) summaries. 

This is ready on DEV.

Comment entered 2021-11-01 10:30:07 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

Verified on DEV. Thanks!

Comment entered 2021-11-10 11:23:11 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

Additional changes are required.

In addition to removing the PDQ branding from the document title it was discussed that the string "-Patient Version", which is added to the CDR document title by the filters, shouldn't be added to the SVPC documents.

We will still need to discuss if this string should be added to the partner document or not.

Comment entered 2021-11-16 19:22:10 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

We will still need to discuss if this string should be added to the partner document or not.

No, we won't need to discuss this because we are stripping the "-Patient Version" and "-Healthprofessional Version" string from the title supplied to the partners already.

Comment entered 2021-11-24 13:26:05 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

The removal of the string "-Patient Version" from the summary titles was causing the title for the partners to be stripped completely.  That has been fixed by modifying the following filter:

This change also includes the removal of the Summary attribute "@PartnerMergeSet".

Comment entered 2021-11-29 11:23:21 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

Verified on DEV. PDQ branding and Patient Version no longer show up in pub preview.

Comment entered 2022-05-26 13:43:18 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

Verified on QA and PROD. Thanks!

Elapsed: 0:00:00.001433