CDR Tickets

Issue Number 3097
Summary Add option for LOERef display to Filter interface
Created 2010-02-24 16:08:27
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Assigned To Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2010-04-28 16:20:05
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/ocecdr/issue.107425
Description

BZISSUE::4773
BZDATETIME::2010-02-24 16:08:27
BZCREATOR::Volker Englisch
BZASSIGNEE::Volker Englisch
BZQACONTACT::William Osei-Poku

We've added a new parameter in OCECDR-3075 in order to display a table of LOERef elements at the end of a QC report.
Now we'll need to modify the filter interface
http://mahler.nci.nih.gov/cdrFilter.html
allowing us to use this new option when testing QC reports.

Comment entered 2010-03-31 11:49:21 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-03-31 11:49:21
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::1

We also added a new parameter to treat vendor output differently depending if the filter set it run as PublishPreview or not. The new parameter to be added is called
isPP

Comment entered 2010-03-31 16:43:15 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-03-31 16:43:15
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::2

I modified this HTML file since it was needed to finish OCECDR-3105.
CdrFilter.html - R9569

I've added three new parameters:
isPP, isQC, and loeRef

This is ready for review on MAHLER.

Comment entered 2010-04-08 16:35:03 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-04-08 16:35:03
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::3

During our status meeting I said I would go ahead and close this issue. However, I now realize that the changes have not been copied to BACH yet.

William, do you feel comfortable testing this change or should I rather ask Alan to test since you probably don't use this form often, do you?

Comment entered 2010-04-08 16:48:47 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-04-08 16:48:47
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::4

(In reply to comment #3)
> William, do you feel comfortable testing this change or should I rather ask
> Alan to test since you probably don't use this form often, do you?

I will go ahead and do a quick test since I use the form every now and then. But also ask Alan to test.

Comment entered 2010-04-21 17:12:37 by Osei-Poku, William (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-04-21 17:12:37
BZCOMMENTOR::William Osei-Poku
BZCOMMENT::5

(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > William, do you feel comfortable testing this change or should I rather ask
> > Alan to test since you probably don't use this form often, do you?
>
> I will go ahead and do a quick test since I use the form every now and then.
> But also ask Alan to test.

I tested this on Mahler and it appears to be working fine. It may be good to also have Alan test it as you suggested earlier. But my test worked fine. I linked blocked levels of evidence term to a summary and filtered it. It was able to correctly identify the blocked document. But it identified the blocked document regardless of whether I selected the LOE Ref check box or not. On the other hand if you let me know how to perform the test, I can do it.

Comment entered 2010-04-28 16:20:05 by Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C]

BZDATETIME::2010-04-28 16:20:05
BZCOMMENTOR::Volker Englisch
BZCOMMENT::6

The following web-page has been copied to FRANCK and BACH.
CdrFilter.html - R9569

Because this page is for internal use only I decided to copy this to production without further testing.

Closing issue.

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000712