EBMS Tickets

Issue Number 459
Summary [Reports] Citations By Status - Changes to Selection Criteria and to the Board Member Responses Version of the Report
Created 2017-09-05 12:02:32
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Assigned To Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2019-08-12 08:00:03
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/oceebms/issue.213833
Description

We would like to make the following changes to the Citations by Status report.

To the selection criteria for the Board Member Responses version of the report:
1. Please add a date range (referring to the date the response was submitted).
2. Please remove the Review Cycle options.

To the Board Member Responses version output:
3. Please display the summary topic in a new column on the far right.
4. Please remove the Exclusion Reason, LOE, and Cycle columns.

Comment entered 2018-02-21 11:02:09 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Holding off on story-point estimate for this ticket until the requirements are nailed down.

Comment entered 2018-02-21 17:36:36 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

I updated the description with our requirements (finalized today). Thanks.

Comment entered 2019-08-08 17:03:17 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

This is another set of enhancements which would have benefitted from being requested in separate tickets (if fact, I had forgotten that the "Citations by Status report" is actually eight different reports, sharing the same request form, so I probably wildly underestimated this ticket).

For the new data range fields, where the requirements say "response was submitted," are you referring to the date the status was set? (Not all status setting involves a response, for example, when a status is set by a fast-track import.)

Comment entered 2019-08-08 17:56:47 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Part #2 has been implemented on DEV. The new date range fields (part #1) have been placed on the form, but not hooked up to the queries for the eight reports, pending an answer to the question above.

Comment entered 2019-08-08 19:38:43 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Parts #3 and #4 have been implemented on DEV. Reassigning to Robin for the answer to the question above about the new date range fields.

Comment entered 2019-08-09 13:59:16 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Sorry, Bob, but parts #1 and #2 of this request were only intended for the Board Member Responses version of the report. Sorry that wasn't explained clearly in the requirements.

Comment entered 2019-08-09 14:29:43 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

The other seven reports have been rewritten to go back to their original behavior. Please test cycle filtering for those reports.

Comment entered 2019-08-12 08:00:03 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Implemented on DEV.

Comment entered 2019-10-02 17:03:33 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Verified on QA.

Comment entered 2019-12-12 13:10:01 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Verified on PROD

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000542