EBMS Tickets

Issue Number 202
Summary [Literature] Create Packet page - changes for all Boards
Created 2014-06-03 13:16:07
Issue Type Improvement
Submitted By Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]
Assigned To Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]
Status Closed
Resolved 2014-08-01 14:54:33
Resolution Fixed
Path /home/bkline/backups/jira/oceebms/issue.128773
Description

We would like to make a few changes to the create packet page:

1. Please add the number of articles in parentheses beside each topic.
2. Please have the packet name field seeded with the topic and the current review cycle in parentheses. For example, "Genetics of Breast and Ovarian Cancer (June 2014)". The field should remain editable.
3. Please add a link from the title of the article to the full citation page. Clicking on the link should open the full citation in a new browser tab.

Thanks.

Comment entered 2014-08-01 14:54:33 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

This is ready for review on DEV. Please note that up to now we've been very careful to use the standard markup practice for field labels on forms, making sure that for checkboxes the labels are clickable. What we've just done with the article titles on this page subverts that mechanism, and changes the behavior to which users have become accustomed. It will no longer always be true that clicking on the label for an article toggles the checkbox selection state for that article. Just so you know. :-)

Comment entered 2014-08-15 17:28:16 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

I've verified these changes on DEV, but I'm not sure if the current review cycle is giving us what we expected. For example, today, August 15, the field is populated with "September 2014", yet we wouldn't be sending the September mailing for a couple of weeks. Maybe we should use the current month & year as opposed to the review cycle. Victoria, does that make sense to you?

Comment entered 2014-08-15 18:29:42 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Let me know what you decide. As I recall, we carried over the concept of 'current review cycle' and its meaning from the old CiteMS system. It would be easy to use the current month instead of the current cycle. I'll wait for your decision.

Comment entered 2014-08-20 16:21:16 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

We discussed this in our meeting today. Please seed the packet name with the current month and year in place of the current review cycle. Thanks.

Comment entered 2014-08-20 16:33:54 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Done. I assumed you wanted me to use the 3-letter abbreviations for the month names, but that's easy to change if I guessed wrong.

Comment entered 2014-08-20 16:36:07 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Sorry - I should have specified. Please spell out the month. Thanks!

Comment entered 2014-08-20 16:40:50 by Kline, Bob (NIH/NCI) [C]

Done.

Comment entered 2014-08-20 16:42:25 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Looks good - thanks. Verified on DEV.

Comment entered 2014-09-12 12:35:27 by Shields, Victoria (NIH/NCI) [E]

Verified on QA.

Comment entered 2014-10-31 16:03:23 by Juthe, Robin (NIH/NCI) [E]

Verified on prod.

Elapsed: 0:00:00.000858